Are Mary Magdalene and Mary of
Bethany one and the same person? This
is not a new idea, and it has a perfectly respectable pedigree: it was first
mooted by Pope Gregory 1. It becomes
problematic only when it gets into books like The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail.
Then we get something like this.
Christ
married at the age of about sixteen. He
married Mary Magdalene/Mary of Bethany – take your pick, they’re one and the
same person – at the wedding at Cana.
Barabbas was an early son. At the
crucifixion, the crowd called for Barabbas so that the son could be preserved,
even if the father had to die. In fact,
Christ was given opium on a sponge: fooling the Romans into thinking he was
dead. Pregnant Mary Magdalene was then
smuggled across to France
by Joseph of Arimathea and Lazarus: the
“beloved disciple” and Christ’s brother-in-law. Christ may have joined Mary in France and
fathered more children. And so on. The rest we know from The da Vinci Code.
Readers seeking a balanced interpretation of the evidence would do well
to try John Wenham’s little gem of a book, Easter
Enigma. This makes a convincing case
for the extra-biblical Western tradition that Mary Magdalene and Mary of
Bethany were, indeed, one and the same person.
Here is a brief summary; although no substitute for the book itself.
Mary,
leaving Bethany ,
became a courtesan in Magdala.
Spiritually rescued by Christ (the “seven devils”), she wept at his
feet. Luke does not mention her by name,
since the Gospel writers are reticent about dwelling on the past sins of
believers. She returned to Bethany , and later
anointed Christ with oil in a re-enactment of the earlier event.
That
is the only support that Wenham’s
work lends to the theories of Baigent
and Co. Mary, for Wenham,
witnessed the Crucifixion and the Resurrection: as befitted one of the most
devoted of Christ’s followers. After the
Mother of our Lord, she is the most favoured woman in the Bible who appears “as
suddenly as a meteor, shines brightly for a moment, and then disappears
forever.” No more and no less.
No comments:
Post a Comment