If you venture to criticize modern society, it will usually be
assumed by your fellow moderns that you do so because you idealize the
past. You must belong to the “fings ain’t
what they used to be.” and, “It wasn’t like that in my day!” brigade.
This may be true of a Conservative, but it is
not true of a Christian: eternity, rather than the past, is the criterion by
which Christianity judges the present.
For the Christian, there
have been no unequivocally good old days since the days in the Garden of Eden –
in whatever sense you interpret that period – and even then the command to
subdue the Earth was forward-looking and developmental.
If you want what I would
call the horizontal view of history, you must look to the Classics. There you find the three Ages – Golden, Silver
and Bronze – with the most virtuous era the one furthest in the past. The modern equivalent – and exactly opposite
in its conclusions – would be Utopian social evolutionism: in which, by
definition, the present is better than the past; and, by definition, the future
will be better than the present.
Real Christianity – with
its awareness of human sin in every age – has never been idealistic in this
way. Real Christianity has inclined to
what I would call the vertical view of history.
That is to say the divide is not between one age and another, but – at
any point in history – between one mindset and another. The sort of thing I mean is exemplified in
Augustine’s City of God: two communities, co-existing through time;
one with its focus on the Kingdom
of Heaven , the other on
the Kingdom of the World. Augustine
probably got the idea from the parable of the wheat and the weeds growing together
until the final harvest; or perhaps from the Book of Revelation, in which the People of the Lamb are in conflict
with the People of the Beast until the Last Judgment brings a final parting of
the ways.
What are the relative
proportions of each group? My guess is
that the numbers of each are pretty constant through time, whatever the
appearances might be. Although the
Eighteenth Century was nominally ‘Christian’, the percentage of actual
believers was probably about the same as it is now. In our own aggressively-secular age when there
is no point in being a Christian – and much disadvantage – unless you genuinely
believe, there are probably more genuine believers than the secularists would
care to admit. But who is genuine and
who is not – at any point in history – is not for us to judge.
In one sense, Christianity has something in common with both the
Classics and Utopianism. Like the
lamenter for the lost Golden Age, the Christian looks back to what humanity has
lost through the Fall. Like the social
evolutionist, the Christian looks forward to the future: although belief about
what that future will be, and how it will come about, shows the inhabitants of
Augustine’s two Cities at their most irreconcilable.
Interesting - here is my take on the same theme...
ReplyDeletehttp://bornagainagnostoc.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/history-and-all-that.html