ALLIANCES


 
 
Political alliances are funny things.  While some of them are akin to lifelong marriages, many more seem to end in divorce.
            Thus the German states were Britain’s allies against Napoleon, only for the French to become Britain’s ally against the Germans.  The hostility of Britain and the United States towards Russia transformed into a mutual alliance against Hitler –  the sufferings of the Russian convoys a case in point – only to transmute again into the Cold War.  Osama bin Laden was once backed by America… Etc. 

 
Within modern Britain, it seems to me there is a triangle of forces: Secularism, Christianity and Islam.    And both of Christianity’s opponents in some sense need  it – or may need it  in the future: Islam for a united front of faith against religious scepticism; Secularism for defence of the western-European tradition against the ideological inroads of Islam.

 
Western complacency about Constantinople – it doesn’t need help; it’s always been there; it always will be – received a rude awakening when Islam breached the impregnable walls: with help from a European cannon maker.   So much for those who take the Church for granted.  I only hope that those who want to get rid of it altogether, and have been systematically expunging the Judeao-Christian tradition from every aspect of western life, know what they are doing.  I hope they are not sawing off the branch they are sitting on, or creating an opening for an alternative religion they would like even less. 

 
“Better the devil you know” is – hopefully – an inapposite way of designating the role of Christianity in British life. Better, perhaps, is the regret expressed – too late - by Hamlet towards Laertes:

That I have shot my arrow o’er the house
And hurt my brother.

 

 
 


  

 
 

   

     


 




 

 
     

 

 

 

6 comments:

  1. Explorer ,

    Well I had a look at your least looked post.

    Have you ever thought of Genesis 1 as being a Hymn or Psalm?

    See you around.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello David. Not specifically, but I think it's a very good description that might save a lot of angst about scientific veracity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well I guess the issue of creation's been around for a while. Are you finished with this blog or will it be added to ? I wasn't sure as to whether it should go on my reading list you see.

      Delete
    2. It's not a blog like Cranmer's: it's about timeless issues, not current ones.

      It's like an extended book of essays. I'm not adding to them at the moment because I'm concentrating on my novel, but since there are sixty-eight of them, that's enough to keep people going for a while.

      I don't advertise it at all, but I get a fairly steady trickle of visitors: some from Cranmer, some as a result of internet searches that have picked out a key word. (When that happens, I tend to get six to a dozen hits on the same essay: fifteen one after another for 'Is Shakespeare possible?') Generally, it's only Cranmerites who comment.

      Re your reading list, consult with Hannah and Cousin Lou. They read a lot of them last year.

      Delete
  3. Have you taken a break, Explorer?

    Thanks
    Ivan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello, Ivan.

      Have been out of a commission for one reason or another for the last month or so.

      Will be returning to Cranmer shortly.

      Delete